City of Santa Cruz
City Council
Tuesday, October 27, 2026, 12:30 PM
How to take part
Show up: Tuesday, October 27, 2026 at 12:30 PM, Council Chambers, 809 Center Street, Santa Cruz. California's open-meetings law (the Brown Act) gives you the right to speak on agenda items. Remote-participation links, when offered, are on the agenda.
Write in: citycouncil@santacruzca.gov (from City of Santa Cruz City Council page (santacruzca.gov/Government/City-Council), checked 2026-09-22)
Deadline: Recent City Council agendas set the deadline for correspondence to be included in the agenda packet at 5:00 p.m. the day before the meeting.
Email sent to the Council is public record.
What's being decided
- Major· Transportation & traffic, Public safety, Taxes, fees & budgetParking permit price increase, parking and street code rewrite, and new Vision Zero targets
The Public Works Department is asking the City Council to take four related actions on transportation and parking rules citywide. The first is a first reading ("introduce for publication") of an ordinance that would amend Municipal Code Chapters 10.41, 10.52, 15.12, 15.15 and 15.20 and add a new Chapter 15.14, covering residential permit parking, authority to set parking meter rates, crosswalks, parking, plan lines (the lines that set where future street widths or rights-of-way will go), multimodal transportation, and accessibility requirements. The second raises the price of annual resident and guest parking permits in the Residential Permit Parking program, and the third sets formal Vision Zero targets to cut traffic deaths and serious injuries on city streets by 30% by 2030 and 65% by 2040, reaching zero by 2050. The fourth finds the package exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act.
- Major· Housing, Planning & development, Environment & climateCode changes on inclusionary housing, farmworker and supportive housing, and lot consolidation
The city wants to make a batch of changes to its zoning and subdivision rules plus the General Plan. The main pieces: waive the roughly $2,000 boundary adjustment (lot-line) fee for projects that combine two or more lots and add at least two new homes; remove the rule that planned development permits (which allow a project to vary from zoning standards in exchange for public benefit) can only be used on sites of 20,000 square feet or more; change zoning so transitional and supportive housing is treated the same as other homes of the same type in the same zone; allow farm employee housing as state law requires (six or fewer employees treated like a single-family home, up to 12 units or 36 beds treated like any agricultural use); clarify wording in the inclusionary (below-market housing) rules; and update General Plan language to match the 2022 Climate Action Plan and the 2025 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan – Climate Adaptation Plan. A yes vote approves the first reading of the ordinance and adopts resolutions changing the General Plan and the fee schedule.
- Major· Water & utilities, Taxes, fees & budget$151 million construction deal for Graham Hill Water Treatment Plant upgrades
The City Council is being asked to green-light construction of a major rebuild of the Graham Hill Water Treatment Plant, which was built in 1960, expanded in 1968, and largely not upgraded since the 1980s. A yes vote approves the final design, signs a Tenth Amendment with the AECOM/W.M. Lyles Joint Venture of Fresno setting a guaranteed maximum construction price of $151,194,799.22, hires Carollo Engineers, Inc. of Walnut Creek for $10,699,078 to oversee construction and environmental compliance, and lets the City buy its own insurance for the job through a multi-agency insurance pool run by Public Risk Innovation, Solutions, and Management. The rebuild includes new pre-treatment basins with high-rate clarification, a new ozone treatment facility, new biologically active filtration, new washwater tanks, a new chemical handling building, upgraded electrical systems, and new operations, maintenance and filter buildings.
- Notable· Taxes, fees & budget· Consent agendaYear-end budget changes for the fiscal year that just ended
This is the city's end-of-year cleanup of its budget for fiscal year 2026, which has already ended. Finance staff reviewed where departments and projects spent more or less than the council had approved, and this resolution formally moves money between funds and projects to match what actually happened. The largest pieces include a $1,218,000 General Fund transfer to the Municipal Wharf fund and $1,431,989 to the Parking fund to cover spending that exceeded those funds' revenues, $1,584,070 more for outside legal services in one General Fund department, and the shifting of big street projects (such as Downtown Intersection Improvements and Bay Drive Protected Bike Lanes) out of the Gasoline Tax fund into the General Capital Improvement fund. A yes vote adopts all of these adjustments; staff say the changes are one-time and do not create ongoing spending commitments.
- Notable· Taxes, fees & budget, Government & transparency· Consent agendaRestating the 2027 budget for new accounting system and rewriting money policies
The city switched its financial software from Tyler EDEN to Workday, and Workday uses a different account numbering system. This item would re-state the already-adopted Fiscal Year 2027 budget in the new Workday coding structure, with the same total dollar amounts the Council approved in June. It would also update five Council financial policies and cancel two others that have been folded into the updated ones. Notable policy changes include sending 5% of any General Fund surplus to the Economic Development Trust Fund and lowering the surplus transfer to capital projects from 20% to 15%, and changing the Economic Development Trust Fund's funding to a flat 7% of hotel tax revenue.
- Notable· Transportation & traffic, Housing, Schools & youth· Consent agendaFinal vote on alternative traffic-reduction rules for school district housing projects
City rules currently require that any residential project with 20 or more units built within a half mile of public transit sign a contract with Santa Cruz METRO to give all residents unlimited local transit passes. This ordinance would let a public school district that is the applicant for such a project choose a different path instead: propose its own Transportation Demand Management Plan (a package of measures meant to cut car trips and miles driven), which the Public Works Director may approve at their discretion. A yes vote gives the ordinance its second and final adoption, after the Council passed it for publication on October 13, 2026 by a 7-0 vote.
- Notable· Water & utilities, Planning & development· Consent agendaFinal vote on sewer rate rules and reimbursement for owner-built sewer mains
This is the final vote on Ordinance No. 2026-18, which changes the city's sewer rules in Municipal Code Chapter 16.12. It lets a property owner or developer pay for and build sewer improvements — such as sewer mains, lines, laterals, interceptor sewers and pump stations — and then sign a "reimbursement agreement" with the city so later property owners who benefit from that same sewer work pay back a share of the cost. A yes vote adopts the ordinance, which takes effect 30 days after final adoption; the council already approved it for publication on October 13, 2026, by a 6-0 vote with Vice Mayor Kalantari-Johnson absent.
- Notable· Planning & development, Jobs & local economy· Consent agendaExtending the life of older commercial permits to January 1, 2030
The city wants to re-adopt a rule it already passed in 2025: any commercial use permit that was active on January 1, 2019 or approved any time up through December 31, 2026 would automatically stay valid until January 1, 2030, unless the Council extends it further. Normally a permit dies 36 months after approval if it is not used, or six months after the permitted business stops operating, which forces the next business in that space to repeat the full discretionary permit process. The Council first approved this as Ordinance 2025-18 in August and September 2025, but staff later found the public notice did not meet the stricter requirements for changes to the city's Local Coastal Program, so that ordinance could not be sent to the California Coastal Commission. A yes vote is the first reading of a new ordinance that repeals Ordinance 2025-18 and re-enacts the same change with proper notice, plus a finding that the change is exempt from environmental review.
- Notable· Jobs & local economy, Planning & development, Taxes, fees & budgetVacant storefront rules changed, fees waived for 20 new businesses, $76,000 window grants
The council would take the first vote on changes to the city's "Vibrancy Ordinance" (Municipal Code Chapter 5.84), the rules for empty ground-floor storefronts that began as a Pacific Avenue pilot in June 2025. The changes would expand the rules in stages — full enforcement across the Downtown Plan Area starting January 1, 2027, with maintenance standards and optional window coverings citywide, and full citywide enforcement on January 1, 2028 only after a council review in Fall 2027. The council would also raise the annual registration fee for storefronts vacant two years or more from $1,621.89 to $4,000 (adjusted each January 1 by inflation starting in 2028), waive up to $14,000 each in planning and building permit fees for the next 20 new businesses citywide, and move $76,000 from the Economic Development Trust Fund into a grant program that reimburses up to $2,000 per storefront for window coverings. A yes vote introduces the ordinance for publication, with final adoption at a later meeting.
- Notable· Housing, Planning & developmentProgress report on design guidelines for multifamily housing
City planning staff are giving the Council a progress update on a project to write voluntary design guidelines for larger apartment and mixed-use buildings in Santa Cruz. Since March 2026 staff have held a roundtable with architects and builders, a July 23 community meeting hosted by a Planning Commission special meeting, and an August online survey that drew 753 responses; a draft guidelines document is now being written. A yes vote simply accepts the informational report and gives staff feedback — it does not adopt any guidelines or change any rules. Staff plan to take a draft to the Architectural Review Committee in late 2026 or early 2027, hold focus groups with groups that were underrepresented in the survey, and then return to the Planning Commission and Council.
- Minor· Government & transparency· Consent agendaCity to reject or return three liability claims
Council would reject the claim filed by CSAA Insurance Exchange, return the claim of Christopher William Fillion as filed too late, and return in part and reject in part the claim of a person identified as Jane Doe, as staff recommend.
Everything else on the agenda
- 1Conference With Legal Counsel – Liability Claims (Government Code §54956.95)
- 2Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (Government Code §54956.9(d)(1))
- 3The City Council will review the meeting calendar attached to the agenda and revise it as necessary
- 4Minutes of the October 13, 2026 City Council Meeting (CC)
- 5Resolution Setting the Regular Meeting Schedule of the City Council for the 2027 Calendar Year (CC)